Monday 16 April 2007

Rick Doty has The Truth

Here's a dialogue I had recently with Rick Doty - Ex AFOSI ( and to his credit) one of the major players in the Aviary. It went like this...

Dan Smith, Jack Sarfatti, Lee (OM),Richard Davis, Victor Martinez, Surfer Doc, John Hicks, Chris Iversen, Bob Collins, Eric Davis, Rick Doty, Paul McGovern, Gene Loscowski, Ernie Kellerstrass, Kit Green, and I, were discussing the alledged incredible disclosure coming from deep within the USG/CIA via (alledgedly) Ron Pandolfi - the actual article is referenced here: http://lucianarchy.proboards21.com/index.cgi?board=dansmith&action=display&thread=1151161712&page=16#1176438192

Virtual Table Tennis: Some pretty amazing revalations were apparently coming forth, not least, the supposed story behind the 'Ocelot & Ferret' trips down to Los Alamos to bring back updates on some special 'Visitors' of the USG. Now some of the 'old guard' of the Aviary (and elsewhere) were getting pretty hot under the collar about these latest developments - understandably - let's face it, some of those guys had been at the rock-face for nigh on 30 years +, and faced knock-back after knock-back. Then these new guys from OM (www.OpenMindsFOrum.com) come on the block and seemingly within a mere year hit the mother load. Yeah, they have every right to feel pissed off...

Anyway, Rick Doty was one of them - instead of joining in playing some good shots, the guy just bangs his hands on the table and kicks off a hulabaloo, hardly making friends or influencing people... So, after about 250kb of in depth dialogue and front-line insight, officer Doty comes into ping-pong game with:

"I know the truth. I don't play with amateurs."

So I ask him,

"Could you please tell us what it is?"

Surprisingly, given his reticentce to contribute up until this point, Rick responds...

"Do you actually think I would related the "TRUTH" to someone I don't know and over an insecure means such as the Internet?"


Excellent, at least we are having some sort of dialogue... OK, so let's play this carefully and with some respect.

So I respond... My serve:

"Why not - what's the big secret still in 2007? There is no such thing as security anyway. The TRUTH is for everyone, and after 60+ years, "security" is running a little thin as an excuse not to disclose. We already know ETs are still here, there was an exch-prog back in the 70s, and the ET's went back on the deal. That's no secret. Do you know more than that? Go on, please. Do - The Right Thing. We're all share the same planet. Don't we?"

Still not cutting me off, just yet - Rick kindly returns with a back-hand and top-spin accross the court...

"It is a lot more complicated then just that. That is why I said, "I don't play with amateurs" You obviously have never served in the military, kept secrets or had an allegiance to your country.". he says


Love - 40, Game point.

My serve:

"Humanity is my allegiance. Secrets are for controling humanity. This is NOT about National security anymore. It's about International security. You know that as well as I do, so let's not hide behind that. Please."

With a back-spin volley...

"Like I said, I don't play with amateurs if you don't think the entire Enigma isn't National Security related."

Game to Doty.

Not much of a match of course, and Ricks returns were pretty dull, no real quality or content. I was pretty unimpressed. Still I can look forward to a pre-recorded match due to be shown on BBC1 this summer. Apparently, so I hear, it's more about the AFOSI deal of disinfo and poor Mr Bennewitz rather than flying saucers and such.

Hey-ho! Back to the more interesting disclosure business of the 21stC .... more later!

1 comment:

REALITY uncovered said...

Hmm, interesting blog you have here Bren. Any reason for the name DanB, or is that a tip of the hat to Burisch?

Not sure about your interpretation of recent events however. It seems you are jumping to exactly those conclusions they want you to.

Look around the corners, under the rocks, behind the sofa and under the bed. Failure to do any of that could lead to others thinking that you're part of the game in the first place.

What's the next move? From looking at the pieces on the table, I would say checkmate in 3?

Cheers,
Steve